Friday, March 21, 2008

From The (Canadian) Anglican Journal

Judge reserves decision in dispute over Niagara parishes
Solange De Santis
staff writer
Mar 20, 2008
Canon Charlie Masters

Hamilton, Ont.

The diocese of Niagara returned to Ontario Superior Court on March 20, seeking access to three parishes that voted to leave the Anglican Church of Canada; however, after a full day of arguments, the judge reserved a decision until a later, unspecified date.

Saying “you are not getting an answer today,” Judge Jane Milanetti let stand an interim Feb. 29 ruling from another Superior Court judge that barred the diocese from sending clergy into the three churches and holding services for the minority that is loyal to the diocese and the Canadian church. The diocese was seeking an order that would stand until the question of who owns the churches is decided, a process that could take years if it comes to a trial.

In the absence of a ruling on Mar. 20, Maundy Thursday in the church calendar, members of the three congregations at odds with the Canadian church can celebrate Good Friday and Easter services in their buildings. The three churches are St. George, Lowville; St. Hilda, Oakville and Good Shepherd, St. Catharines, all in southern Ontario.

Rev. Susan Wells, whom the diocese appointed to manage St. George, said those loyal to the diocese will meet for Easter Sunday services at a United church. Kay Mighton, a member of St. George’s, said the situation “makes me feel very sad. My husband and I will likely go to Grace (another Niagara church) for Good Friday.” Lawyers for both sides said about 25 to 30 people at St. George remain loyal to the diocese, but that virtually all parishioners at St. Hilda and Good Shepherd agreed with the decision to leave. The diocese includes 98 parishes.

Canon Charles Masters, who has been rector of St. George for 27 years, said the lack of a decision produced an “empty feeling,” but said he and the congregation are glad to “preach the good news of Jesus” this Easter weekend.

The Anglican Network in Canada, which includes parishes that have broken away from the national church over theological differences including homosexuality, released a statement saying it regretted that “it was necessary to defend the right of these congregations to maintain their ministries in the buildings where they have always worshipped.” The network had hoped “we could resolve all issues through amicable discussions but at this point, we are at the mercy of the courts and we await this decision,” said Cheryl Chang, a lawyer and director of the network.

The diocese had asked Judge Milanetti to allow it to administer the three churches jointly with the current membership (which it called “the withdrawing members”) and allow it access for a Sunday morning service, feast day services and weddings and funerals.

Diocesan lawyer John Page alleged that the three churches, by voting to join the South American Anglican Province of the Southern Cone and seek oversight from its archbishop, have violated the canons, or laws, of the diocese. Individuals may choose to leave the Canadian church, he said, “but a parish cannot. It remains in trust for the Anglican Church of Canada.” He also said those who wish to remain part of the Canadian church are long-time worshippers and have family and emotional ties to their churches.

Peter Jervis, counsel for the three churches, said they contend it is the diocese that has contravened the basic tenets of traditional Anglicanism by voting last fall to allow the blessing of same-sex unions. Clergy maintain that those who disagree with the votes to leave are welcome to continue worshipping, he said. “This is about the diocese wanting to come in and plant its flag,” he said.


Grandmère Mimi said...

Kate, it's a mess, isn't it?

Those breakaway congregations haven't always worshiped there. Members of the Anglican Church of Canada have always worshiped there.

I hope that they find the "purity" that they are so desperately searching for, but I believe it is not to be found this side of heaven.

Kate Morningstar said...

Grandmere, Canon Masters was interviewed on CBC (national public) radio, shortly after our General Synod in June. With Dean Peter Wall, from our Cathedral, who got inhibited from performing weddings for a while a few years ago, bcz he did a wedding for a lesbian couple -- can't remember if it was IN the cathedral or not.

The interviewer pushed Canon Masters hard on the purity question: did he marry heterosexual couples who had been living together (in sin) before their weddings? Eventually, he had to answer, "Yes." Because, everybody does, pretty much.

It's so difficult. People DID keep going to Jesus and saying, "She's doing that and we don't like it," in one way or another. The woman caught in adultery, for example. And Jesus was pretty consistent in his response to the complainer: "You need to go get yourself right with God." Amen, and amen.